Asus M81C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 18%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus M81C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M81C
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '17 at 17:12
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom Z3745
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
17% Very poor
SC Int 30.7
SC Float 17.6
SC Mixed 22.4
19% 23.6 Pts
QC Int 123
QC Float 70.5
QC Mixed 89.7
22% 94.4 Pts
MC Int 124
MC Float 70.4
MC Mixed 89.6
14% 94.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 18%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 190D) 1,022MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.7
1% 2.67 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.1
1% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SDW32G 31GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 158
Write 72.7
Mixed 101
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 8.16
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 3.16
23% 8.19 MB/s
DQ Read 8.58
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 3.13
6% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M81C Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 18%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M81C

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $286AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback