Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 19 '17 at 07:47
Run Duration	517 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 196 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 755 70% 582 Pts	64-Core 1,183 73% 1,183 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 21.1 13% 17 fps	MRender 20.9 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141 6,458 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 121GB free Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 130 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 4809 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 121 (64) Unknown 100 100 894208 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 0 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 28 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 13 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 9502 (B3) Unknown 0 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 43 100 270583595051 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 130 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 9 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 130 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3187 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2005 (F2) Unknown 100 100 700 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 2948	137% Outstanding	Read 1,253 Write 783 Mixed 739 204% 925 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 16.2 105% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 24.9 63% 133 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 159%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 1,850 Write 905 Mixed 1,115 284% 1,290 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 35.6 143% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 632 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 158 199% 364 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 243%
WD Red Pro 4TB (2014)-$229 679 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3TB free Firmware: 81.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 153 144 11333 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3966 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4787 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 171 (10) Unknown 14 186 256095823329 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 108 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8126 (C2) HDA temperature 111 105 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	96.4% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 146 Mixed 155 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.27 107% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 101%
WD Red Pro 4TB (2014)-$229 679 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3TB free Firmware: 81.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 152 144 11358 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3941 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4776 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 181 (10) Unknown 19 181 351508243732 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 118 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7966 (C2) HDA temperature 111 105 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	96.7% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 149 Mixed 158 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.51 4K Mixed 0.31 110% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 101%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3TB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 195 191 9216 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4089 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4710 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 119 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 84 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 15428 (C2) HDA temperature 118 110 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.4% Very good	Read 139 Write 137 Mixed 136 104% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.32 128% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 100 29437168 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 19 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 211198 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 35 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 62 639172640 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 104 (C2) HDA temperature 32 40 107374182432 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 81183471829009 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3449257465 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3380127229	90.3% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 149 Mixed 89.9 100% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.23 84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 421GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 65.6 Write 67.4 Mixed 64.6 85% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.22 71% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 61%
LaCie Rugged THB USB3 1TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 287GB free, PID 1075 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 58.7 Write 61.9 Mixed 59.6 78% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.32 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 165%
LaCie Rugged Mini USB3 1TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 186GB free, PID 106b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 51.6 Write 56.3 Mixed 50.5 69% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.37 65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 50%
LaCie Rugged Mini USB3 1TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 166GB free, PID 106b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 71.9 Write 70 Mixed 65.8 89% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.38 76% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 50%
LaCie Rugged Mini USB3 1TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 122GB free, PID 106b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 59.2 Write 61.8 Mixed 56.3 76% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.33 36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 50%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500G 500GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 162% 71GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	298% Outstanding	Read 341 Write 349 Mixed 304 425% 331 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 27.7 2,884% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 39.4 DQ Write 93.5 DQ Mixed 28.4 4,293% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 298% Great: 308%
LaCie Rugged Mini USB3 1TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 11GB free, PID 106b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	26% Poor	Read 67.1 Write 50.4 Mixed 69.5 79% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.32 70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 50%
LaCie Rugged Mini USB3 1TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1GB free, PID 106b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 83.4 Write 51 Mixed 34.4 64% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.34 66% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 45.5 MC Write 46.7 MC Mixed 40.9 127% 44.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16