Lenovo 3264N3U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3264N3U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20120926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '17 at 08:49
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 334
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 308F) 806MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.14 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 200
Write 67.4
Mixed 103
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 6.86
41% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 6.72
7% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback