Asrock 870 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 870 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100914
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 15 '17 at 21:55
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 82.6 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 117 54% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 211 24% 187 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 18.9 Parallax 23.2 20% 22.4 fps	MRender 28.7 Gravity 26.8 Splatting 19.3 20% 25 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 3GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10806 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2939 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 59 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 63 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1967873149
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75 5,727 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 112 (B1) Unknown 100 100 165553 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 18 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9218 (F2) Unknown 100 100 12252	68.3% Good	Read 476 Write 206 Mixed 279 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 25.6 101% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 42.7 57% 103 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 444GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 129 129 124 (03) Spinup time 119 119 38686163425 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 10581 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 29313 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5694 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 10873 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 10873 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 188979609630 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	35.6% Below average	Read 72.8 Write 51.1 Mixed 27.2 37% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.43 99% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 203GB free Firmware: 1AA01110 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 77 875 (03) Spinup time 77 77 7830 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9297 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10043 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 26571 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6140 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 77 875 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 7263 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 58 386990103 (C2) HDA temperature 75 57 437321753 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1720647 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	40.2% Average	Read 71.4 Write 68.3 Mixed 32.2 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.48 120% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 96GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 113547928 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9570 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 146878202 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12335 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3193 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 65 77763837979 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 89 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 76 76 49640 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 -140737488355301 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -86195698656625 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13354663935 (F2) Unknown 100 253 21661770528	34% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 54.2 Mixed 34.5 37% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 5.32 4K Mixed 0.42 174% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 112%
ASMT 2115 500GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 43GB free, PID 0411 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 30.5 Mixed 30.5 39% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.19 40% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM 533 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	15x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 193 samples	3x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	2x

RAM
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 4GBUnknownBench 31%, 4 samples	2x
99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 6GBKingstonBench 50%, 4 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 42%, 629 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $112

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16