PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-M WS (all builds) |
Memory | 29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160801 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '17 at 21:06 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
|
49%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
Gigabyte(1458 22DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.11.3
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C4005T3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
56.7%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
64.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 39x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 23x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 17x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 13x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $472 |