Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101101
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	May 15 '17 at 20:28
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 133 61% 97.3 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 263 35% 261 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti (448 Core LE) 2,165 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Zotac(19DA 2207) 1.2GB CLim: 765 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Lighting 24.2 Reflection 36.8 Parallax 26.7 20% 29.2 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 27 23% 28 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6925 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1183 (B1) Unknown 94 94 68 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 43 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 44 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17944429563	34.6% Below average	Read 232 Write 38.9 Mixed 69.1 24% 113 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 10.1 61% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 39 DQ Mixed 26.8 42% 84.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 19GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 93 76956259 (03) Spinup time 90 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4406 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 809916488 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 24965 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4400 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 43 198240960551 (C2) HDA temperature 39 57 51539607591 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 66 62 72646807 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	40.9% Average	Read 71.8 Write 70.6 Mixed 69.1 53% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.37 89% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-USB3 Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	143x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	86x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	18x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	95x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	68x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16