Toshiba Satellite A665

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite A665 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA NWQAA
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '17 at 03:33
Run Duration	499 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 90 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 102 56% 85.6 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 215 23% 184 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FD30) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.66% Terrible	Lighting 3.13 Reflection 4.92 Parallax 1.28 3% 3.11 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 3.26 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.66% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1107 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 803 (A5) Unknown 100 100 77320749203 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 35 (A8) Unknown 100 100 8 (A9) Unknown 100 100 407 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 39 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 66 283468890143 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 180390461482 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1113 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3039 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2295 (F2) Unknown 253 253 6936 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	34% Below average	Read 259 Write 153 Mixed 155 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 6.27 30% 9.54 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 30 47% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 108%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 3,421 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 4.11 Mixed 6.25 10% 9.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.005 4% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 8%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,276 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Read 23 Write 6.4 Mixed 10.1 14% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.32 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.009 17% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CF8 2x4GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.3 18% 6.13 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite A665 Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A665

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	30x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	23x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	20x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	65x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	34x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
480GB 480GBNetacBench 69%, 1,056 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	24x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	11x
TSB1066D3S7DR8/2G 2x2GBKingstonBench 25%, 367 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16