Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	22 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170505
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	May 14 '17 at 01:10
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 79.1 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 871 79% 666 Pts	64-Core 1275 79% 1275 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	131% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 204 Parallax 180 149% 189 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 187 Splatting 128 120% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 709GB free Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5067 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 92 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8 (AE) Unknown 100 100 65 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 44 240519741477 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9542152755 (F7) Unknown 100 100 298369854 (F8) Unknown 100 100 126121870 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4421 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	82.5% Excellent	Read 482 Write 345 Mixed 339 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 26.4 107% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 55.1 85% 163 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 105%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 408GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13255 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 144 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 43 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 64 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13998459582	108% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 412 Mixed 421 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 45.3 165% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 107 122% 211 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 337GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	295% Outstanding	Read 2,593 Write 1,774 Mixed 1,862 460% 2,076 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 63.3 224% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 141 149% 247 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 295% Great: 353%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0701 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 140 Write 141 Mixed 133 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.2 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB 4,608 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 30.7 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 34.4 SC Mixed 27.3 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $86Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)