Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131002
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 13 '17 at 08:37
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$57 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 126 58% 93.5 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 284 31% 245 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.7% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 148 Parallax 133 90% 131 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 131 Splatting 111 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6859 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1936 (B1) Unknown 94 94 61 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 284 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25502124640	51.4% Above average	Read 297 Write 192 Mixed 200 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 15.7 88% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 62.8 DQ Mixed 15.7 21% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 6GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 117 Write 106 Mixed 64.7 71% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.22 98% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11.5 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	40x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	7x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	4x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	4x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	4x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
VERTEX3 60GBOCZBench 60%, 3,574 samples	2x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16