Asus CG8270

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus CG8270 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8270
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '17 at 07:10
Run Duration	618 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 42.8 2-Core 73.1 45% 65.8 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 470 34% 310 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 841D) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	21% Poor	Lighting 24.6 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 30.3 20% 26.2 fps	MRender 33.8 Gravity 29.1 Splatting 23 23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 75 (03) Spinup time 138 138 34386936221 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 16656 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 31322 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 16633 (C0) Power-off retract count 87 87 16659 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 16659 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 210454118432 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	55.9% Above average	Read 96.9 Write 97.6 Mixed 102 75% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.2 85% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 107%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 35.1 Write 35.6 Mixed 34.4 45% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 44%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 4,486 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 4200, Staples Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	4.02% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 2.38 Mixed 4.05 7% 6.97 MB/s	4K Read 5.91 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.003 22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.02% Great: 10%
SanDisk Ultra USB 2.0 16GB 1,306 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 14GB free, PID 556c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	7.7% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 4.39 Mixed 6.19 10% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.23 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 1.28 88% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.7% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 4x8GB 327 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.3 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	227x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	18x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	11x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GBUnknownBench 54%, 1,334 samples	13x
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	12x
EL64C1C1624Z1 2x4GBAdataBench 55%, 601 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16