Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-V (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '17 at 06:13
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CYP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 95.1 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 174 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 344 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E271) CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 34.6 Parallax 46.6 31% 39.9 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 31.8 Splatting 38.9 28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2004 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1476 (B1) Unknown 98 98 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 47 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1099 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4673530488	61.3% Good	Read 297 Write 302 Mixed 252 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 19.7 97% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 37.2 DQ Write 62.8 DQ Mixed 20 24% 40 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 213GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 117 4116 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 788 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11971 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 784 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 177 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 130 130 210499 (C2) HDA temperature 118 103 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 6	49.6% Average	Read 85.1 Write 87.9 Mixed 46.8 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.17 61% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 149GB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 200586376 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4650 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 59 54 373736689222 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5036 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3383 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 71 71 29 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590131206 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 41 472917803036 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1231 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 40483 (C2) HDA temperature 28 59 64424509468 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 110118666505640 (F1) Unknown 100 253 60365760525648 (F2) Unknown 100 253 49167443184501	53.7% Above average	Read 91.4 Write 95.9 Mixed 45.5 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.23 66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 4x4GB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	63.2% Good	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 20.3 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 17.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 56.7 71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	223x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	149x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	39x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	28x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16