Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z68-V GEN3 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '17 at 08:56
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 171 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 344 46% 341 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2103 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 62.5 Reflection 67.8 Parallax 57.9 51% 62.7 fps	MRender 59.3 Gravity 62.5 Splatting 63.7 51% 61.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 6689874 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 112107236384676 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4811 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1454 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6689874 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6689874 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6689874 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 86 86 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 30017 (EA) Unknown 0 0 27524 (F1) Unknown 0 0 27524 (F2) Unknown 0 0 24225	36.2% Below average	Read 188 Write 58.5 Mixed 79 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 11 78% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 66.3 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 8.28 20% 43 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 51%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 439GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 179 179 34379465043 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 810 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2910 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 809 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 810 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 810 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 176094117922 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.1% Good	Read 104 Write 112 Mixed 112 83% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.23 109% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 108%
WL250GSA1672B 250GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 217GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 136 132 4191 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2120 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10653 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2110 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 791 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1328 (C2) HDA temperature 108 94 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.1% Good	Read 116 Write 93.4 Mixed 102 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.39 92% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GB 6,486 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 17.7 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.6 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z68-V GEN3 Builds (Compare 854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	251x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	198x
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	63x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	28x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	41x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	29x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $526

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16