LG 14ZD960-GX76K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLG 14ZD960-GX76K  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 14Z960
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161011
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '17 at 03:19
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 121
57% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 166
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1854 0248) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 2
2% 2.41 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000B1 512GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 495
Mixed 505
112% 503 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 48.5
158% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 116
122% 204 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback