Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M LE (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120307
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 09 '17 at 19:58
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G630-$37 12,397 User benchmarks, average bench 47% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 84.1 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 126 58% 93 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 142 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2618 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 0.94 1% 1.19 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2762 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 720 (B1) Unknown 98 98 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4303563488	53.2% Above average	Read 378 Write 225 Mixed 216 60% 273 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 11.5 80% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31 DQ Write 31.6 DQ Mixed 12 14% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 114%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 219GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 3210 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9322 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 29604 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 6587 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 59 370409494 (C2) HDA temperature 78 56 437518358 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 111272 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	60.3% Good	Read 103 Write 107 Mixed 103 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.47 115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB 26,466 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.9% Average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 11.4 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	103x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	85x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	44x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	26x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	27x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
Team-Elite-1600 Kingston 9905584-027.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 53%, 16 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16