Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	May 07 '17 at 23:07
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 142 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 437 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 437 27% 437 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 61 52% 64.3 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 53.9 50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8527 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1647 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 7 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15463851880
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 24GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13830 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2495 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 116 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4492455586	75% Very good	Read 441 Write 323 Mixed 339 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 21.6 105% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 56.3 66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 118%
Samsung HM080GI 80GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 74GB free Firmware: HG100-08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 8629 (03) Spinup time 252 252 2062 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5417 (05) Reallocated sector count 82 82 171 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 10582 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 10 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2860 (BF) G-sense error rate 2 2 999999 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 335 (C2) HDA temperature 166 100 197569282072 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 45654 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 98 95 23 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 437 (C9) Soft read error rate 252 252 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 98 98 2831 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 126992	29.7% Poor	Read 51.4 Write 52 Mixed 48.7 38% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.33 81% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 35%
WD WD7500AARX-00N0YB0 750GB 1,212 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 37GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 113 110 7308 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6897 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27677 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3358 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 156 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 104 104 289541 (C2) HDA temperature 121 106 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.3% Poor	Read 52 Write 49.8 Mixed 51.5 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.16 65% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 61%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB 702 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free, PID a0a4 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 180 Write 167 Mixed 133 200% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.35 67% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50.1% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 17.7 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12.9 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16