Asus P6T SE

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T SE (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 07 '17 at 06:54
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 168 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 403 43% 344 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	37% Below average	Lighting 46.2 Reflection 52.3 Parallax 56 38% 51.5 fps	MRender 50.9 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 40.2 36% 44.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 106081 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1144 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 549 (64) Unknown 100 100 1563424 (65) Unknown 100 100 227008 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 26 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 460 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1309 (B7) Unknown 99 99 5 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 25 100 171799609369 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 106081 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 106081 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2765 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1071 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2205 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1928 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 106081	37% Below average	Read 223 Write 129 Mixed 127 35% 160 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 8.76 65% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 46.3 DQ Mixed 8.57 15% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 389GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 171 2050 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1179 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1131 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 566 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 30 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2021 (C2) HDA temperature 116 110 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.2% Very good	Read 134 Write 132 Mixed 113 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.35 136% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 109%
WD WD1600AVJS-63SWA0 160GB 1,301 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 60GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 135 4016 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11939 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15796 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4723 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 222 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11939 (C2) HDA temperature 116 96 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 487 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	48% Average	Read 82.8 Write 84.1 Mixed 57.1 56% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.41 112% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 52%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 11GB free Firmware: 4.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12826 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 257030144 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17050 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5924 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 53 789512220 (C2) HDA temperature 28 47 64424509468 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 90 61 194400548 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	41.1% Average	Read 73.6 Write 69.6 Mixed 23.5 41% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.31 71% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 54%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 136 125 6158 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13170 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17247 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4630 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 98 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 181 181 57204 (C2) HDA temperature 121 108 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 116 97 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.6% Below average	Read 61.7 Write 58.6 Mixed 25.8 36% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.11 50% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x1GB 2,345 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 6 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 20.2 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.8 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	505x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	224x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	70x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	212x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	138x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16