User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemINT430 SYSFexxx
MotherboardDell 04YY4M
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '17 at 21:14
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 184
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 430
50% 389 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000M
Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 327.62
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
8.84% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 12
Parallax 9
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 11.7
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 835
Write 598
Mixed 682
157% 705 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 9.59
51% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 9.87
23% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston X7C75G-HYC 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 21
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 19.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback