Asus P9D WS

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9D WS (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 06 '17 at 20:40
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203 3,014 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 111 2-Core 215 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 566 61% 483 Pts	64-Core 560 35% 560 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 17 Parallax 20.1 18% 19.8 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 16.8 17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 14TB free Firmware: 0001 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 484 Write 238 Mixed 358 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 19.1 82% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 79.7 DQ Mixed 59.1 72% 130 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 324GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 747 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 115 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 58 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1973299627	88.6% Excellent	Read 496 Write 403 Mixed 410 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 21.9 131% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 37.8 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 22 49% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 134%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 62GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 39591 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1211 (B1) Unknown 80 80 730 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 50 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 537 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32686566761	57.5% Above average	Read 488 Write 179 Mixed 287 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 10.6 67% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 61.6 DQ Mixed 11.1 49% 115 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 76%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 6TB free Firmware: 0001 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 141 Mixed 135 120% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.25 96% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 105%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 243GB free Firmware: 0001 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 76.9 Write 80.3 Mixed 76.2 59% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.41 105% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	60% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 18 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 20.3 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9D WS Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P9D WS

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	7x
Core i3-4130Intel $42Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	7x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
530 Series 240GBIntel $149Bench 76%, 16,872 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x

RAM
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	5x
99U5471-054.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 1,249 samples	5x
9965525-138.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 230 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $230

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16