Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMay 03 '17 at 00:52
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 382
44% 342 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4274
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 8.62
Parallax 4.62
4% 6.08 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 4.57
Splatting 12
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 080. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 99.4
Mixed 79.1
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.24
77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
573GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 94.2
Write 59.6
Mixed 52.8
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.15
46% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
483GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 128
Write 95.7
Mixed 127
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 94.2
Write 60.4
Mixed 83.9
60% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.45
102% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 65%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
358GB free
Firmware: 500. Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 88.3
Mixed 23.6
49% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.32
102% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS725050KLAT80 500GB-$83
122GB free
Firmware: 2KOA Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 38
Write 37.8
Mixed 17.6
23% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 34%
WD My Book Elite 2TB
135GB free, PID 1111
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20% Poor
Read 37.9
Write 38.3
Mixed 31.9
46% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.28
78% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 25.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $531
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback