Asus X750JB

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus X750JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X750JB
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 02 '17 at 12:32
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 140 68% 110 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 332 34% 277 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M 15,605 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 122D) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8189 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.36% Terrible	Lighting 5.73 Reflection 6.12 Parallax 5.38 5% 5.74 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 5.61 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.36% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 480GB-$400 512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 317GB free Firmware: M311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4932 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2230 (AB) Unknown 100 100 1 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 1 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 0 68723736610 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 20190 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9274 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9256 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 21320	50.6% Above average	Read 498 Write 347 Mixed 407 93% 417 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.93 36% 8.09 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 102%
OCZ INTREPID 3800 200GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.4.7.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3152 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 910 (64) Unknown 100 100 58411136 (AB) Unknown 88 0 2935 (AE) Unknown 15 100 141 (B8) Unknown 11 100 393 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 86 66 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3537 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5022 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 943035689 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 100 100 10000 (CE) Flying height 0 100 0 (CF) Spin high current 44 100 1331 (D0) Spin buzz 28 100 862 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (D3) Unknown 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 66084 (D5) Unknown 100 100 36416 (D6) Unknown 100 100 29668 (DD) G-sense error rate 100 100 2869568 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 1 100 1 (E9) Unknown 92 0 92 (F9) Unknown 100 100 79658 (FB) Unknown 100 100 12321	89.7% Excellent	Read 392 Write 399 Mixed 368 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 31.3 133% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 92.8 104% 172 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB 9,208 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.4 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.6 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X750JB Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X750JB

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	120x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	88x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	34x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	30x
ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,492 samples	15x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBSamsungBench 38%, 63 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $399

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16