Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 01 '17 at 05:36
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 82.3 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 768 77% 624 Pts	64-Core 986 61% 986 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781 8,241 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AMD(1002 0B36) CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.3 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Lighting 82.1 Reflection 57.8 Parallax 110 67% 83.2 fps	MRender 55.4 Gravity 86.6 Splatting 74.5 60% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	241% Outstanding	Read 2,844 Write 1,172 Mixed 1,364 392% 1,793 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 28.6 165% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 71.3 82% 139 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 241% Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 20GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8593903697 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 67078799230267 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 388 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 58 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 33 73016606744 (C2) HDA temperature 24 33 73016606744 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 98 98 8593903697 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 98 98 8593903697 (CC) Soft ECC correction 98 98 8593903697 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 81604378625 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6793 (EA) Unknown 0 0 712 (F1) Unknown 0 0 712 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1030 (F4) Unknown 99 99 2424869	61.9% Good	Read 499 Write 125 Mixed 192 59% 272 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 12.9 101% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 37.3 52% 95 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 13GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6949 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1968 (B1) Unknown 89 89 122 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 46 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 86 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30312352001	78.5% Very good	Read 496 Write 352 Mixed 343 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 21.2 115% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 50.6 47% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 100GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 21728880 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2006 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 111085703 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6944 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1980 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 7 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 46 505217053 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 68 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8917 (C2) HDA temperature 29 54 42949672989 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -80380312937915 (F1) Unknown 100 253 42923772420 (F2) Unknown 100 253 58408731296	84.9% Excellent	Read 133 Write 163 Mixed 128 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.24 74% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 43.7 MC Write 36.4 MC Mixed 33.8 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 41 SC Mixed 25.5 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)