Asrock X79 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140213
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '17 at 23:24
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 195 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 497 54% 426 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100 26,726 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Sapphire(174B E322) 2GB CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.3 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 23.2 Reflection 29.4 Parallax 27.9 19% 26.9 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 20 Splatting 31.2 22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 92 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 47 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 59 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 18 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1326754722
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 74GB free Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8094 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4266 (B1) Unknown 88 88 120 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 53 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1384 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17002117713	58.2% Above average	Read 455 Write 134 Mixed 199 57% 263 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 9.91 76% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 27.2 72% 158 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 73%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB 12,976 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 930GB free Firmware: 77.04D77 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 238 (03) Spinup time 186 185 6658 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4979 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16098 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4863 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 387 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 25 25 526329 (C2) HDA temperature 107 91 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.7% Above average	Read 101 Write 100 Mixed 103 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.22 75% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 57%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 739GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 117 (03) Spinup time 122 122 38685508055 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5869 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11165 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5499 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5987 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5987 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 240519807022 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 166	55.8% Above average	Read 102 Write 92.3 Mixed 98.2 74% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.39 100% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 61%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 230GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 48 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11340 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32267 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 89 89 11051 (C0) Power-off retract count 195 195 3860 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11340 (C2) HDA temperature 104 93 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.6% Above average	Read 104 Write 96.3 Mixed 94.7 74% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.33 104% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 55%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 71GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 175 2208 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11291 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32231 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 89 89 11048 (C0) Power-off retract count 195 195 3901 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11291 (C2) HDA temperature 100 91 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.9% Average	Read 81.8 Write 74.5 Mixed 77.1 59% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.37 102% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4 - $290

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	86x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	51x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	25x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	23x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GBSamsungBench 201%, 5,877 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 52%, 780 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GBCrucialBench 43%, 2,652 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 2x8GBCorsairBench 44%, 2,237 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $818

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16