Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3802 x 2138 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '17 at 17:19
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 70.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 198 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 748 68% 570 Pts	64-Core 1,209 75% 1,209 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11D8) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 381.89 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 68.6 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 57.3 56% 63.9 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 64.4 Splatting 63.7 53% 65 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10516 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 136 (B1) Unknown 98 98 64 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 79 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10021016186	100% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 496 Mixed 511 114% 509 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 37.9 134% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 91.5 93% 150 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 124%
WD WD5000ABPS-01ZZB0 500GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 91GB free Firmware: 02.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 164 4641 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9517 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 24 24 55628 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 358 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 202 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1053770 (C2) HDA temperature 117 91 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.7% Below average	Read 72.2 Write 62.4 Mixed 64.7 50% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.38 105% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 3GB free Firmware: CC3G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 100248277 (03) Spinup time 100 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4210 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 19 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 45858410 (09) Power-on hours count 30 30 62148 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 447 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 25770196998 (BD) vendor-specific 28 28 72 (BE) vendor-specific 64 42 1379306897444 (C2) HDA temperature 36 58 64424509476 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 27 15 100248277 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 50775103395251 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4019625383 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1856169041	39.1% Below average	Read 65.4 Write 70.9 Mixed 79.5 54% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.33 76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 249GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 36 Write 37 Mixed 10.5 33% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.36 71% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 6,789 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.2% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 23.6 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 20.8 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)