User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Systembluechip
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '17 at 16:23
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 119
47% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 180
23% 176 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
AMD(1002 00D0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 19.5
18% 19.2 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 20
14% 16 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 61.8
Mixed 59.1
46% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.31
89% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 CL7-7-7 DDR3-1333 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 CL7-7-7 DDR3-1333 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback