ACER M5640/M3640

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ACER M5640/M3640 (all builds)
Motherboard	ACER MCP73PV
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080911
Uptime	16.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '17 at 09:59
Run Duration	336 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 49 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 25.2 23% 30 Pts	4-Core 35.5 8-Core 34.5 5% 35 Pts	64-Core 30.1 2% 30.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.52 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.21 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 86.9 Write 73.2 Mixed 78.6 18% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 6.27 48% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 12.6 DQ Write 38.6 DQ Mixed 6.8 11% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 298GB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 87.7 Write 64.5 Mixed 67.3 55% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.19 74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 67%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 43GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 47.4 Write 41.9 Mixed 38.4 32% 42.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.17 53% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 55%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA 500GB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 38GB free Firmware: V56O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 42.3 Write 40.6 Mixed 38.3 30% 40.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.28 84% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 9GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	9.93% Terrible	Read 32.9 Write 10.8 Mixed 9.39 18% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.27 4K Write 0.59 4K Mixed 0.01 36% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.93% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.15% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 1.6 MC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.3 3% 1.2 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.15% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5640/M3640 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: ACER M5640/M3640

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	1x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	1x

SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16