Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '17 at 09:32
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 216 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 836 75% 634 Pts	64-Core 1,170 72% 1,170 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.89 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 140 Parallax 121 111% 132 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 125 Splatting 102 90% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 391GB free Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 618 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 160 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 32 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 62 163209674779 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2198415931 (F7) Unknown 100 100 68767427 (F8) Unknown 100 100 50779819 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4385 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	73.3% Very good	Read 483 Write 343 Mixed 342 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 22.6 87% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 51.7 63% 113 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 105%
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310 2,086 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 190GB free Firmware: X4120000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1279 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 314 (A5) Unknown 100 100 10158201 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 54 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1159 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 41 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 74 64 274878955546 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 146030723106 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2086 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2351 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2203 (F2) Unknown 253 253 9330 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	61.5% Good	Read 482 Write 235 Mixed 271 72% 329 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 15.4 85% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 19.1 28% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 106%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 78 11553499 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 63685775071059 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1447 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 87 (B1) Unknown 0 0 21 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11553499 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11553499 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11553499 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 22005 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20306 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20306 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8301	40.2% Average	Read 197 Write 99.5 Mixed 114 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 9.44 75% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 25.4 42% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 61%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 53GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 38304079 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5480 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 41708916 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8252 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1785 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 98 5 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 538902559 (C2) HDA temperature 31 52 68719476767 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 22 38304079 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 197 133 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -134496900864118 (F1) Unknown 100 253 707623211 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3347701888	43.8% Average	Read 79.3 Write 73.5 Mixed 67.3 55% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.22 56% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140 4,858 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	MC Read 36 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 31.2 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 27.7 82% 28.6 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $734

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)