VIT NP3020M3

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	VIT NP3020M3 (all builds)
Motherboard	VIT NP3020M3
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '17 at 16:42
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 188 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 324 47% 344 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 4.47 4% 4.3 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 7.04 5% 5.75 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 81470196 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 133350144616541 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1199 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 285 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 70 90198900767 (C2) HDA temperature 31 70 90198900767 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 81470196 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 81470196 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 81470196 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18618 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9370 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9370 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12519 (F4) Unknown 98 98 196739152	55.3% Above average	Read 506 Write 185 Mixed 198 64% 296 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 10.6 77% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 45.6 DQ Mixed 10.6 15% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 465GB free Firmware: 1H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 139 3975 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 124 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 111 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 42 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 303 (C2) HDA temperature 113 110 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	68.8% Good	Read 121 Write 119 Mixed 115 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.47 108% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 286GB free Firmware: 1H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 139 4008 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 111 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 40 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 216 (C2) HDA temperature 111 109 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	67.1% Good	Read 120 Write 114 Mixed 109 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.41 101% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR1881ME68FAF1600 2x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.2 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 19.1 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NP3020M3 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: VIT NP3020M3

CPU
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
SATA SSD 512GBAddlinkBench 84%, 759 samples	1x

RAM
RMR1881ME68FAF1600 1x8GBRamaxelBench 29%, 23 samples	4x
RMR1881ME68FAF1600 2x8GBRamaxelBench 54%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16