Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100525
Uptime	10.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '17 at 03:21
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 142 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 338 35% 284 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.3.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 62.3 Parallax 89.7 58% 74.4 fps	MRender 60.9 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 79.2 56% 66.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2195 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 367 (B1) Unknown 98 98 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 58 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12761300761	43.5% Average	Read 200 Write 188 Mixed 176 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 14.5 77% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 36.8 DQ Mixed 14.2 16% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 173 6250 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1153 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7383 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1012 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1032 (C2) HDA temperature 129 108 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	73.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 125 Mixed 118 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.57 4K Mixed 0.24 110% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 64GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 171 4316 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1272 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8421 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1050 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 127 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1144 (C2) HDA temperature 125 104 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	45.7% Average	Read 84.8 Write 74.6 Mixed 64.3 56% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.19 56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 45GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 152 (03) Spinup time 104 104 55878681248 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3924 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 134 32 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 23651 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2487 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4233 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4233 (C2) HDA temperature 250 250 257698824216 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	29.5% Poor	Read 49.1 Write 53.5 Mixed 68.7 44% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.36 80% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 46%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 665GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 29.2 Mixed 29.6 38% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 0.75 4K Mixed 0.2 33% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 15.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 9.9 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	496x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	198x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	68x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	221x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16