Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '17 at 00:01
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 67.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 200 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 674 63% 522 Pts	64-Core 934 58% 934 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.3% Above average	Lighting 62.8 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 87 51% 72.4 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 58.6 Splatting 55.6 49% 60 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 261GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 276 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 56 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 66 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2650096833	89.6% Excellent	Read 509 Write 414 Mixed 413 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 24.4 133% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 70.3 65% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 856GB free Firmware: 1AN10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 7639 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 68 35 9752 (04) Start/Stop count 70 70 31097 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 21722 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3006 (BF) G-sense error rate 98 98 22317 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 206159216672 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1597 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 94651	54.5% Above average	Read 78.7 Write 111 Mixed 98.3 72% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 59%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 814GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5357 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 628 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3531 (0A) Spinup retry count 112 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 532 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 5104 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 653 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159478823 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 92 92 3466 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 216 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	72.8% Very good	Read 124 Write 130 Mixed 126 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.18 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.26 115% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 104%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 363GB free Firmware: CC3H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 69916596 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 15155 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 70221500 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27883 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4341 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295098381 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 178 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 639959078 (C2) HDA temperature 38 48 64424509478 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 25 69916596 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 133457518813280 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1918678067 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1479025836	45.3% Average	Read 82.8 Write 75.2 Mixed 62.6 55% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.28 69% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 66%
HP Desktop HD BD07 2TB 451 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 509GB free, PID bd07 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 85.2 Write 75.7 Mixed 79.8 102% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.17 69% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.8% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 24.7 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 21.1 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	415x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)