Asus P5N-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5N-D  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1176 x 664 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080305
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 27 '17 at 20:34
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 58.6
20% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 116
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 35% Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Zotac(19DA 3115) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 7.43
Reflection 7.73
Parallax 2.53
6% 5.9 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 5.73
Splatting 5.13
5% 5.89 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500AVJS-63B6A0 250GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 77
Write 75.2
Mixed 71.9
56% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.18
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
1GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 28.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 25.5
33% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.63
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 2.8
310% 4.71 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.46% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.8
2% 0.7 GB/s
Latency 675
6% 675 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $491
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback