Toshiba SATELLITE C670-18C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C670-18C  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Oneonta Falls
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '17 at 17:31
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B950
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 82
1-Core 49
2-Core 78.5
47% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 86
8-Core 109
12% 97.4 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Toshiba(1179 FC71) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.58 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.09 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 54.1
Write 54.1
Mixed 53.2
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.17
46% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback