HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110610
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '17 at 16:57
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 161 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 314 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 19.4 18% 19.4 fps	MRender 23.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 16.4 16% 20 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 20290518 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19636590477422 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 25 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 44 34362621984 (C2) HDA temperature 32 44 34362621984 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 20290518 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 20290518 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 20290518 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 8589934593 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4294962610 (EA) Unknown 0 0 612 (F1) Unknown 0 0 612 (F2) Unknown 0 0 332 (F4) Unknown 99 99 6225970	38.5% Below average	Read 186 Write 151 Mixed 148 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 6.95 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 13.1 59% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 83.7 DQ Write 98.4 DQ Mixed 40.5 44% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 75GB free Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 93 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 95 (03) Spinup time 119 100 17192190149 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2985 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11429 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2703 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 28378472 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 54 203423776 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2988 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2988 (C2) HDA temperature 187 136 197569019936 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	38.2% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 66.1 Mixed 65.2 50% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.37 86% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 4F TS512MLK72V3N ID:01 4F TS512MLK72V3N ID:01 4F TS512MLK72V3N ID:01 4F TS512MLK72V6N 50GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.2% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.1 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	487x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16