Notebook P775DM(-G)

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Notebook P775DM(-G) (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P775DM(-G)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '17 at 16:42
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 263 92% 164 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 775 78% 634 Pts	64-Core 791 49% 791 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M 10,379 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1261 MHz, MLim: 1362 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.89 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Lighting 56.2 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 53.5 46% 56.5 fps	MRender 66 Gravity 56.1 Splatting 57.3 49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 458GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10457 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4723 (B1) Unknown 96 96 146 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 34 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 321 (F1) Unknown 99 99 110175456767	105% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 478 Mixed 503 112% 499 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 26.3 135% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 78.8 130% 252 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 428GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7066 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2440 (B1) Unknown 98 98 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 26 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 620 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17267694424	81.4% Excellent	Read 496 Write 249 Mixed 359 81% 368 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 27.5 135% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 43.9 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 88.6 83% 122 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 126%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 2,220 Write 1,396 Mixed 1,472 375% 1,696 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 28.9 128% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37.3 DQ Write 74.6 DQ Mixed 23.4 27% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 298GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2882 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1056 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 18 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 75 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12889828819	113% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 413 Mixed 421 100% 452 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 96.1 4K Mixed 49.2 181% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 116 125% 207 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB 5,327 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 26.6 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 26.6 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 57.4 70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P775DM(-G) Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

System: Notebook P775DM(-G)

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	1x
Quadro M3000MNvidiaBench 27%, 1,726 samples	1x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	1x
850 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 110%, 25,072 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBR 2x16GBCrucialBench 76%, 175 samples	1x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 5,327 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $223

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16