Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '17 at 14:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$194
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 414
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 847B) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.81
2% 2.21 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.96
2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BA200G4 200GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G2010160 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 508
Write 296
Mixed 380
87% 395 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 26.6
108% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 54.5
89% 174 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
147GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 70.7
Mixed 108
73% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.35
94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
9GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 30.4
Write 22.3
Mixed 21.5
30% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.13
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 3.13
357% 5.32 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-084.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback