Asus B150M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B150M-C (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '17 at 08:30
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$76 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 118 2-Core 199 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 328 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT 4,580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3445) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8618 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.24% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.65 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.24% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 128 128 12896436405 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 12 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2516 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 12 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 171799871521 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	80.3% Excellent	Read 151 Write 128 Mixed 141 106% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.22 86% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 1x8GB 4,218 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B150M-C Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B150M-C

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	211x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	135x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	75x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	44x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	24x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 70%, 1,758 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $162

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16