| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151229 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 27 '17 at 05:12 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 66% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.7%
Good
|
56% 88.5 Pts
|
27% 204 Pts
|
13% 205 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.2%
Average
|
43% 61.5 fps
|
52% 64.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
83% 375 MB/s
|
62% 21.2 MB/s
|
12% 22 MB/s
|
|
|
57.5%
Above average
|
70% 93.9 MB/s
|
90% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
30.3%
Below average
|
28% 9.8 GB/s
|
24% 8.47 GB/s
|
56% 70.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |