HP ZBook 17

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ZBook 17 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 190A
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160926
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '17 at 13:39
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150 22,632 User benchmarks, average bench 63% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 83 1-Core 104 2-Core 200 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 525 54% 433 Pts	64-Core 529 33% 529 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4100M 1,157 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 190A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 373.6 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.9 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 23.2 17% 20.9 fps	MRender 23.4 Gravity 24.4 Splatting 20.7 18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08TH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 846 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2111 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 103 (AE) Unknown 100 100 91 (B5) Unknown 100 100 11579317552491 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 111 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 365 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	53.7% Above average	Read 414 Write 247 Mixed 306 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 5.56 62% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 5.79 32% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 69%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77 8,773 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 9GB free Firmware: JF4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 175 100 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 8392 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 12631 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2110 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 73014575104 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 49 287768610 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 160 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1310740 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 116657 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	35.9% Below average	Read 65.4 Write 59.7 Mixed 64.1 48% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.21 62% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 68%
LaCie P9220 2TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 547GB free, PID 106d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 73.4 Write 82.5 Mixed 33.3 78% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.32 70% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 52%
LaCie P9220 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 347GB free, PID 106d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 68 Write 77.8 Mixed 44.2 80% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.36 66% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F 2x8GB 1,682 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 19.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBook 17 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17

CPU
Core i7-4800MQIntel $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples	72x
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	56x
Core i7-4900MQIntel $110Bench 68%, 5,651 samples	18x

GPU
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	114x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	31x
Quadro K5100MNvidiaBench 21%, 641 samples	24x

SSD
MX500 2TBCrucial $132Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	15x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	13x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16