PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock X58 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100311 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Apr 24 '17 at 23:29 |
Run Duration | 83 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.6%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
|
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 31x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 24x |
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 8x |
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $300 |