HP SG3-110UK-m

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP SG3-110UK-m (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AAF
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '17 at 18:06
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29 4,513 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 39.2 2-Core 75.2 40% 61.2 Pts	4-Core 78.3 8-Core 78.1 10% 78.2 Pts	64-Core 79.1 5% 79.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.702.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 0.76 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 1 0% 0.65 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z320 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4295491591 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 49 219043332139 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 8590131203 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 60 (EA) Unknown 100 100 68 (F1) Unknown 253 253 67 (F2) Unknown 253 253 6 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	33.9% Below average	Read 215 Write 140 Mixed 166 38% 174 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 3.45 42% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 97.4 DQ Mixed 5.22 33% 76 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 86%
General UDisk 2GB 1,991 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.63% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 8.6 Mixed 11.2 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.42 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 18% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.63% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 1x2GB 695 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 6 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP SG3-110UK-m

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)