| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121101 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 24 '17 at 17:35 |
| Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
74.2%
Very good
|
70% 119 Pts
|
45% 334 Pts
|
22% 356 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
|
32.9%
Below average
|
32% 40.1 fps
|
35% 43.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
|
|
58.8%
Above average
|
69% 92 MB/s
|
107% 1.14 MB/s
| |
|
|
74.2%
Very good
|
91% 121 MB/s
|
110% 1.29 MB/s
| |
|
|
80%
Excellent
|
97% 129 MB/s
|
157% 1.69 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.9%
Above average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
58% 68.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 458 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 160x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 152x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 43x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 36x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $516 |