| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds) |
| Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150323 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 23 '17 at 16:37 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
60% 99.2 Pts
|
43% 349 Pts
|
27% 432 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.9%
Average
|
46% 66.2 fps
|
48% 59.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
89%
Excellent
|
94% 423 MB/s
|
130% 42 MB/s
|
67% 113 MB/s
|
|
|
37.9%
Below average
|
48% 63.4 MB/s
|
89% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
|
47.2%
Average
|
61% 81.4 MB/s
|
93% 0.78 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.3%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
26% 9.07 GB/s
|
50% 79.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 898 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 441x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 215x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 45x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $630 |