Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Toshiba Satellite L850 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120924
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '17 at 10:34
Run Duration	100 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 86.7 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 111 57% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 104 18% 124 Pts	64-Core 76.6 5% 76.6 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670M 910 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.151.0.0 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.25% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 6.54 Parallax 5.34 5% 6.18 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 7.04 5% 5.85 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.25% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1482 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1173 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 24 24 30717 (0A) Spinup retry count 123 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1125 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 874 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 94 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 17010 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 274878758965 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 31 31 27637 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 180 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 23% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.9% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.1 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	47x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	25x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	5x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	4x
M471B5773CHS-CK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 6GBSamsungBench 38%, 429 samples	3x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16