Illegear Q5 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemIllegear Q5 EVO  (all builds)
MotherboardILLEGEAR ILLEGEAR Q5 EVO
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170213
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 23 '17 at 08:50
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 203
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 539
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 102E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8165
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 32
Parallax 38.1
36% 38.1 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45% Average
Read 471
Write 106
Mixed 192
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 3.72
66% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 3.33
12% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45%
Great: 73%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
650GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 77.7
Mixed 59.1
59% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.37
96% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 70%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB
10GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 36.8
Mixed 38.7
49% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.24
39% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q5 EVO Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Illegear Q5 EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $47
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback