Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '17 at 03:06
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 156
2-Core 308
101% 186 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 818
83% 671 Pts
64-Core 823
51% 823 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 381.65
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 68% Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,026
Write 1,147
Mixed 1,154
318% 1,442 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 41.2
213% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 28.4
147% 336 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 236%
Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
155GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 351
Mixed 357
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 28.1
143% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 92.5
124% 229 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 126%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 156
Write 133
Mixed 144
109% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.37
127% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 174
Mixed 137
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.31
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 25.5
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback