Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Extreme  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110317
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 23 '17 at 02:59
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 97%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 125
54% 88 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 282
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 110
Parallax 142
66% 111 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 135
Splatting 108
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
134GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 261
Write 253
Mixed 241
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 11.6
73% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 19
58% 125 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55%
Great: 111%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
97GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.7% Above average
Read 261
Write 252
Mixed 220
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 12.7
76% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 54.9
74% 135 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 111%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 165
Write 91.9
Mixed 112
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 7.53
48% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 7.46
15% 29.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
364GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 70.9
Write 63.1
Mixed 75.9
53% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
260GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 55.6
Write 84
Mixed 74.2
54% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.37
89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 14
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $628
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback