MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '17 at 23:49
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.20GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 151
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 604
53% 452 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38
34% 37 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 37.2
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 495
Write 127
Mixed 199
59% 274 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 14.2
65% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 44.3
59% 108 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 80%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
233GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 62.6
50% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.45
101% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 51%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
49GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 57.8
Mixed 53
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 35%
WD Elements 1TB
356GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 58.5
Write 50.9
Mixed 35.2
59% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.15
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.3% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 19.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 16.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback