Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '17 at 20:28
Run Duration	440 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 5.1 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 161 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 556 51% 429 Pts	64-Core 552 34% 552 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 196 Parallax 188 133% 182 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 175 Splatting 129 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 957 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 141 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 118 (AD) Unknown 100 100 131080 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 705	70.1% Very good	Read 504 Write 332 Mixed 337 86% 391 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 10.4 78% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 48.1 67% 127 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 97%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 26GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9968 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1327 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 61 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 45 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1515801610	58.2% Above average	Read 493 Write 128 Mixed 194 59% 272 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 10.2 80% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 26.8 60% 126 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 457GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 5 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 76 69 7529 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5154 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7606 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1899 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 227 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 59 180389543966 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 5 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5195	66.8% Good	Read 115 Write 118 Mixed 119 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.38 108% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 75%
WD WD10EURS-630AB1 1TB 3,395 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 269GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 6 (03) Spinup time 130 122 6483 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5876 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14262 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2062 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 103 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 43302 (C2) HDA temperature 114 103 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 187 508 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.5% Below average	Read 77.6 Write 46.2 Mixed 52.7 44% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 60%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 80GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 162 4800 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1891 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 10121 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1000 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1891 (C2) HDA temperature 113 104 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.6% Average	Read 86.3 Write 72.4 Mixed 71.5 58% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.34 86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 62%
Staples 16GB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 15GB free, PID 5573 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	9.84% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 3.47 Mixed 5.21 8% 7.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.73 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 1.46 133% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.84% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBXL F3-1866C9-8GXM F3-14900CL10-8GBXL F3-1866C9-8GXM 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 19 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 14.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	208x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16