Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 153% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 140% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '17 at 09:58
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 281 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 889 87% 715 Pts	64-Core 1095 68% 1095 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E2) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	157% Outstanding	Lighting 242 Reflection 202 Parallax 186 198% 210 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 178 Splatting 130 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 2,860 Write 1,293 Mixed 1,402 406% 1,852 MB/s	4K Read 55.7 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 30.9 206% 80.3 MB/s	DQ Read 548 DQ Write 407 DQ Mixed 205 227% 387 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 233GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1670 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 416 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 56 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 99 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2914135834	113% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 416 Mixed 422 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 45.8 171% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 110 142% 256 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 111GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18035 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 744 (B1) Unknown 95 95 59 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 59 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 340 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26206456435	87.4% Excellent	Read 503 Write 349 Mixed 356 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 25.4 135% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 42.3 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 72 76% 118 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 492GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 13 (03) Spinup time 177 174 4141 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4732 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31826 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 983 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 495 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4236 (C2) HDA temperature 116 109 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.6% Good	Read 116 Write 109 Mixed 92.6 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.4 104% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB 6,687 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	86.5% Excellent	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 27.5 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 22.7 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	138x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	78x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x

SSD
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $120Bench 421%, 18,218 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	14x
9965600-033.A00G 4x16GBUnknownBench 99%, 23 samples	9x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $623

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16