Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '17 at 22:15
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 77.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 237 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 771 76% 620 Pts	64-Core 993 61% 993 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781 8,241 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AMD(1002 0B36) Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.3 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.8% Very poor	Lighting 25.8 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 33.7 21% 25.4 fps	MRender 17 Gravity 25.4 Splatting 21.2 17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 2,852 Write 1,200 Mixed 1,427 400% 1,826 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 22.2 153% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 49.5 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 22.7 40% 75.4 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 21GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4305476642 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -133745281596109 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 374 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 50 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 33 73016606745 (C2) HDA temperature 25 33 73016606745 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 105 105 4305476642 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 105 105 4305476642 (CC) Soft ECC correction 105 105 4305476642 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 81604378625 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6763 (EA) Unknown 0 0 698 (F1) Unknown 0 0 698 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1006 (F4) Unknown 99 99 2424869	56.1% Above average	Read 446 Write 127 Mixed 163 53% 246 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 12.7 98% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 73.3 DQ Mixed 13.1 21% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 13GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6941 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1960 (B1) Unknown 89 89 122 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 46 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 84 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30276377800	81.2% Excellent	Read 495 Write 348 Mixed 342 88% 395 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 21.8 114% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 55.1 66% 116 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 88GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 52962856 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1998 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 110986717 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6936 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1972 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 7 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 46 504823838 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8896 (C2) HDA temperature 30 54 42949672990 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -96529389970882 (F1) Unknown 100 253 42818583819 (F2) Unknown 100 253 58290409639	71.9% Very good	Read 122 Write 129 Mixed 122 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.24 70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 32.3 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 26.5 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)