| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121010 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 21 '17 at 19:55 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.6%
Average
|
54% 82.1 Pts
|
14% 107 Pts
|
8% 128 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
18% 20 fps
|
17% 21.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V54OA73A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
44% 58.1 MB/s
|
74% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5402-060.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.3%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
27% 9.47 GB/s
|
51% 78.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,056 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 179x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 158x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 104x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 69x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 57x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |